JFK Airport Masterpiece 
          Slated For Demolition
        Make JFK 
          Sundrome A Landmark
          
              Historians 
          and regular people who enjoy old buildings are equally challenged. 
               For every iconic structure saved, hundreds, 
          even thousands (in the case of Shanghai, for example) are lost forever 
          in the never-ending building surge. 
               Now, at JFK International Airport in New 
          York, whilst focus has been on The Eero Saarinen TWA Building (Terminal 
          Five), a landmark that fronts a new billion-dollar Jet Blue Airways 
          Terminal, another building of equal importance has been slated for destruction 
          by the Port Authority of New & New Jersey (PANY&NJ). 
               Terminal Six at JFK was designed by Ieoh 
          Ming (IM) Pei and opened in 1970. 
               What is particularly outrageous is that 
          PANY & NJ lumps this treasure almost as an afterthought in a press 
          release announcement April 29 declaring the razing of a bunch of derelict 
          air cargo buildings that would probably fall down under their own weight, 
          if left unattended. 
               A source said that the plan for Terminal 
          Six would include keeping the Sundrome “with modifications” 
          and demolishing the ramp-side part of the structure so that JetBlue 
          can move its international flights, which are currently operating from 
          Terminal Four, into a rebuilt Terminal Six (Terminal Five) complex. 
               But in fact the PANY & NJ press release 
          makes no mention of saving anything about Terminal Six, stating bluntly: 
               “Terminal Six, which housed JetBlue 
          before the airline moved to its new Terminal Five in October 2008, also 
          will be demolished.” 
                The 
          person who might make the difference in all of this is PANY & NJ 
          Aviation Director, Susan M. Baer (right) who, while currently broadcasting 
          the benefits of tearing down air cargo buildings (The 
          New York Times, May 4), has in the past been quite vocal in professing 
          her concern and desire to protect historic airport buildings. 
               But Ms. Baer has been curiously silent 
          as one of the most historic facilities ever built at any airport in 
          the world faces elimination under her watch. 
               Today’s PANY & NJ management 
          may not like what they have to deal with in the form of older airport 
          facilities, but in many cases these buildings are too important, both 
          artistically and for their part in aviation history to be unceremoniously 
          thrown away. 
            
               IM Pei designs are treasured everywhere—for 
          example in Paris, where his Louvre Pyramid is world famous or in Boston, 
          Massachusetts, where his Hancock Tower and John F. Kennedy Library are 
          highly regarded or in Berlin with his iconic German Historical Museum 
          that opened in 2003 or even here in New York with the Javits Center. 
               At JFK, the Master’s Terminal Six, 
          "Sundrome," was in fact the first window-wall construction 
          at any airport in the world. 
               Terminal Six Sundrome should be declared 
          a historic and national aviation landmark. 
               The Port Authority of New York & New 
          Jersey should keep their mitts off the place until a thorough review 
          is conducted by independent historians and preservationists. 
               The aviation and preservation community 
          must have a chance to insure the future of this absolute jewel surviving, 
          as IM Pei created it. 
               Landmark status for Terminal Six will 
          create a powerful bar and guarantee accountability, and in some manner 
          oversee the future of this building against mindless renovation or threat 
          of destruction. 
               Our view is that a large part of the problem 
          facing IM Pei’s Terminal Six is that many people have failed to 
          recognize the masterpiece due to its location. 
               Terminal Six (as mentioned earlier) sits 
          right next to Eero Saarinen’s now protected landmark TWA Terminal 
          Five, often called a “living sculpture,” that gets most 
          of the attention of the public and preservationists. 
               We have an old saying here in America 
          that applies in this case: 
               “Sometimes, you can’t 
          see the forest for the trees.” 
               In this part of the airport, people are 
          looking at the Saarinen TWA building and missing IM Pei’s Sundrome 
          altogether. 
            
               The process has been helped along, by 
          allowing the Sundrome to fall into absolute disarray. 
               We must recognize that two architectural 
          geniuses created a legacy at a great international airport, and that 
          both structures need to be protected.  
               When this publication saved the Marine 
          Air Terminal (MAT) at LaGuardia Airport (and was recognized in 1986 
          by U.S. Secretary of Transportation and the U.S. National Historic Trust 
          in a Washington, D.C. Ceremony), the idea of utilizing a historic airport 
          building as a capstone or entrance to another facility was born. 
               Today, MAT is entrance to Delta Shuttle 
          ops at LGA. 
               At EWR, another early (1934) construction, 
          the exquisite Building One, was saved after we wrote a book about it 
          in 1978, and today it is the airport manager’s office. 
               Same thing goes for TWA (Terminal Five), 
          which will be utilized in some application when PANY & NJ finishes 
          the restoration project. 
               In the case of MAT LaGuardia and the Administration 
          Building at EWR, both structures had also been suggested for demolition 
          by the PANY & NJ at one time or another during the late 1960s and 
          early 1970s. 
               So ever watchful in the spirit of “what 
          goes around comes around,” this latest outrage against IM Pei’s 
          JFK Terminal Six is not a surprise. 
               However the saving of MAT LGA and Building 
          One at EWR has established precedence for adaptive reuse of older generation, 
          one-of-a-kind historic aviation buildings. 
               And I.M. Pei’s Terminal Six at JFK 
          is all of this. 
               Forgetting design significance for a moment, 
          Terminal Six is where Jet Blue was born. 
               It is an airline that nowadays experiences 
          huge success, delivering billions of dollars and thousands of jobs to 
          New York City. 
               Terminal Six at JFK is part of commercial 
          aviation heritage and was created with taxpayer money, so it actually 
          belongs to the people, not Port Authority, which only rents JFK Airport 
          from the City of New York. 
               Anyone who feels the fate of this building 
          can be left to destiny and to the right thing being done here, should 
          contact us at once because we also can secure you a good deal on a bridge 
          that spans the East River between Manhattan and Brooklyn. 
               Let's take the charge and deliver this 
          masterpiece to the next generation. 
               Thanks for any help. 
          Geoffrey Arend/Flossie
        First Article IM 
          Pei JFK Masterpiece To Be Torn Down 
         |