Cargo 2000 Debuts At JFK
On October 4th, a landmark
business meeting took place in the air cargo area of John F. Kennedy International
Airport in New York, as thirty-nine people including twenty-three representative
Cargo 2000 members met to create the newest airport-based Cargo 2000 Association.
"What’s the big deal?" you
might ask?
Well, of all the airports in the U.S. operating
international services, JFK is far and away the big enchilada.
From Dubai to Helsinki to Shanghai to Mumbai,
JFK International Airport serves more overseas destinations than any other
airport in the Western Hemisphere.
Cargo 2000 is a global organization, an
IATA Interest Group, bringing together some 40 major airlines, freight
forwarders, IT providers and ground-handling agents with the goal of implementing
a new quality management system for the worldwide air cargo industry.
The objective is simple: to implement processes,
backed by quality standards, that are measurable and supported by data,
thereby improving the efficiency of air cargo, enhancing customer service
levels and reducing operational costs.
Based on detailed customer research and
with the assistance of leading IT companies, the group has re-engineered
the transportation process from shipper to consignee through a "Master
Operating Plan". This Master Operating Plan is at the heart of an
industry-wide process control and reporting system that in turn drives
the corrective action systems.
Bringing the brilliance, hard work and dedication
of Cargo 2000 to the local level to create an airport coordinating organization,
is a logical next step in the service enhancement scheme.
But
theory to reality can be a long journey; so landing a local Cargo 2000
Association at JFK is indeed a big deal.
FlyingTypers spoke to Cargo 2000 Project Director Ron Cesana
who said simply:
“The best is yet to come.
“Our mission is to elevate efficiency
of the air cargo industry, improve customer service and reduce costs by
developing and implementing a program of business processes and automation
standards.
“Local Cargo 2000 Associations will
adopt the same objective, but are also specifically asked to focus on
implementation of C2K requirements at the local level.
“Some other objectives in the local
Cargo 2000 Association mandate include addressing issues and obstacles
that are specific to each gateway situation.
“Utilizing hands-on local expertise
in the Cargo 2000 atmosphere empowers local groups to identify ways and
means to improve local procedures to standardize and streamline operations,
saving time while reducing costs all around.
“Cargo 2000 is moving to facilitate
e-commerce / e-business locally, thereby reducing paperwork.
“Local Cargo 2000 Associations can
identify "best-known-methods "and share with other C2K working
groups, while acting to facilitate and implement tasks presented by C2K
global project management.”
So JFK cargo executives got together, agreed
to formulate a future based on some new working guidelines.
Barry
Medved (left) of KLM Cargo was elected Chairman of JFK Cargo 2000 Association
with Neal O’Sullivan of DHL Danzas elected to serve as the first
Vice Chairman of the group.
January 25, 2006 was set as the next meeting
date.
Best of all to report is that this first
gathering was better than just a good meeting.
Here a new spirit was palpable with participants
who were outwardly eager to build the new Association by actively contributing
to the project.
This Cargo 2000 Association at JFK will
not be a closed-door, exclusive, “members only” affair either.
To the credit of some hard working community
minded air cargo people, the group plans to invite non-members, and companies
involved in the air cargo process into the Association meeting mix.
As example, The Port Authority of New York&
New Jersey was invited and attended the first gathering.
The upshot of that initiative was tacit
agreement to continue ongoing dialogue between the agency and Cargo 2000
Association at JFK.
Ron Cesana points to other local Cargo 2000
Associations
“We have active local associations
at the following gateways in Europe including FRA and PAR.
“In North America there are now Cargo
2000 Associations at JFK, LAX, MIA, ORD and YYZ and in Asia, Cargo 2000
Association meets regularly at HK.
“Cargo 2000 is at work establishing
new groups at AMS, ATL, BRU and DFW and will continue adding other cities
worldwide during 2006.
“It is worth repeating that the air
cargo industry has little or no data. “There is nothing out there
to tell us how well or badly we are doing.
“Is the industry performing better
than last year?
“Are we better than we were five years
ago?
“This is the first time in the air
cargo industry that a group of airlines, forwarders, ground handling agents,
IT providers and truckers have gathered locally to discuss performance
with data.
“Best of all in the Cargo 2000 atmosphere,
data is produced in the exact same format everywhere in the world because
of the standards that we have either created or adopted.
“We have emphasized at local meetings
that members need to work in a collaborative mode rather than 'finger
pointing' and 'blaming others'.
“Together we can improve performance
adopting a systematic quality approach based on data.”
(Geoffrey Arend)
To The Editor:
I regularly receive your 'newsletter' and read it with interest.
What you published, about SQ (10/20) needs some clarification.
Cargo 2000 is not an 'Award' as your headline indicated, rather Cargo
2000 has developed a 'full fledged' QualityManagement System comparable
to ISO.
A few years ago we contacted both ISO and BSI to discuss setting up
Quality Standards for the Airfreight Industry and then decided that
we had enough expertise within our membership to do it on our own.
We boast that it was created by the Industry for the Industry.
The Cargo 2000 quality system is mostly focused on performance, because
that is what really counts. Members supply monthly reports to Cargo
2000 on their performance and they have to demonstrate 'continuous
improvement ' .
This is very different from ISO.
All Cargo 2000 members are jointly involved in
evaluating data and improving performance.
We have created a structured and systematic approach for that purpose.
Our philosophy is that Airlines/Forwarders need to work 'together'
because irrespective of who fails, it is ultimately the end-Customer
that suffers.
That is why we do not consider the Singapore Airline Cargo certification
as an award.
They have been audited for the Quality System and are providing monthly
reports for the lanes that have received certification.
Kind regards,
Ron Cesana
Project Director
Cargo 2000 |
|