| Thinking 
          CNS PHX Three Weeks Later

      Did 
          you know? Southwest of Tucson there is a deactivated 
          Minuteman silo, which is worth visiting—unless you have claustrophobia. 
          At certain times the lid has to be opened so that the Russians can verify 
          the U.S. is not cheating on the SALT treaty. There is also the Pinal 
          Air Park at Marana (3/4 of the way between Phoenix and Tucson), which 
          stores decommissioned jets; unfortunately, it is not open to the public. 
          It is rumored that it was used as a “secret” airbase.
 CNS 
          2011 saw some 460 conference delegates at its 21st annual event in Chandler, 
          Arizona. Is there a single, effective way to come up with a scorecard? 
          CNS promoted it as a premiere networking event and as billed, it was 
          an unequivocal success.
 What 
          were the planned topics of the program? E-freight, Cargo2000 and security; 
          the speakers, panels and moderators certainly addressed these in one 
          form or another. E-freight is lagging behind despite a collective push; 
          beyond acknowledging and bemoaning this sad state of affairs and flagging 
          it as a perennial project, there were no signs of progress.
 Cargo2000 
          is starting to even sound a little outdated in 2011, and while it provides 
          an array of roadmaps, methodology, measurements and CDMP, it has not 
          generated a significant change in the industry much beyond the major 
          players.
 Security 
          is probably the one area where everyone feels they have skin in the 
          game, but it’s mostly reactionary since developments are government-driven 
          for the most part. Change is the norm and global harmonization of national 
          security programs a hopeful but distant dream.
 So 
          it’s business as usual to a large extent, watching carefully the 
          price of fuel and seeing that 2011 holds up not too far below 2010 business 
          levels. Do we need a conference for that?
 There 
          was an exhibition and one of the stands worth mentioning in my view 
          was Franwell with an allegedly affordable RFID solution based on open 
          standards. Air Canada is a customer and last year it became the first 
          airline to track cargo and mail shipments associated to a ULD at piece 
          level, having tested shipments on the YUL-LHR route; pilot work continues.
 One 
          of the tracks, New Technologies & Standards Impacting the Air Cargo 
          Industry, was well attended, focusing on messaging and RFID. The other, 
          Future Developments for Customs & Security, touched on all the high 
          points but seemed to ignore a roomful of people in attendance, with 
          the panelists endlessly chatting amongst themselves about the state 
          of affairs in the Washington bubble, but sounding pessimistic about 
          real progress in the short term.
 While there is general agreement about security regimes, the extent 
          to which TSA, CBP, the State Department and other government branches 
          can be the sole global role model, and only acceptable model, is rife 
          with speculation. The lack of firm timelines and detailed procedures 
          is just another indicator of the state of flux when it comes to air 
          cargo inbound to the U.S.
 What seems clear is that the express carriers have cut their own deal 
          and to judge by the volumes and last year’s Yemen incident, that 
          matters; the airline/forwarder combination, not so much.
 In our coverage during CNS we addressed the “disappearance” 
          of CNS in IATA. Des Vertannes was present and Aleks Popovich was also 
          there showing the flag but playing no official roles. The conference 
          topics are indistinguishable from standard IATA fare and the management 
          of the event is outsourced to WorldTek, as are all IATA events worldwide. 
          What can IATA do better to really help air cargo? The informal consensus 
          from the secretariat seems to be to just wait for the new IATA DG to 
          be in office in June and then everything will be good.
 That may be too much wishful thinking and a denial of the reality of 
          IATA as an organization and how it evolved over the last twenty years.
 Airlines 
          and forwarders carry on because they have a business to run, day in 
          and day out. Industry framework aside, the degree to which it matters 
          to them barely registers. IATA top management makes an art out of keeping 
          its airline members in the dark to the extent possible. Airline top 
          management is complicit because they do not institute the needed checks 
          and balances to ensure their trade association focuses and works on 
          what is critical to their business, and not IATA’s own objectives.
 That is unlikely to change and it is unlikely we will have the autonomy 
          and visibility cargo needs to thrive and grow.
 It’s all in your hands; as always, we’d like to hear from 
          our readers and your views on this question.
 Ted Braun/Flossie
 |