IATA Changing Cargo Security

 A Transport Canada air cargo security awareness poster

     “Cargo security is in a state of relative infancy when compared with aircraft, passenger and baggage security.
     “Developing an integrated solution, which involves all key supply chain stakeholder groups, is proportionate to the threat, effective, harmonized and sustainable.
     ”Supply chain security is much talked about but insufficiently understood.
“Acceptance of the key principle - that each supply chain member must accept and deliver their proper component of cargo security responsibility-is inadequately embraced.”
     IATA is on the move as John M. Edwards, newly named Head of Cargo Security Czar at the world group has formulated a plan of attack that he hopes will gain support and forge change via a Supply Chain Security Governance Group (SCSGG).
     FlyingTypers has obtained a draft of the IATA Cargo Security Strategy Paper authored by Mr. Edwards that if enacted in whole or part, could change the manner that air cargo security is conducted from the inside out, forever.
     According to the draft, first meeting of the proposed SCSGG is to be held in early 2007.
     The purpose of this first encounter according to the report is to “facilitate broader industry stakeholder understanding and consensus of supply chain security issues and improved communication between industry associations and regulators”.
     IATA also proposes to “reach-out to relevant industry associations including TIACA, IAHA (International Aviation Handlers Association) and others while working to “develop a global baseline supply chain security strategy and secure endorsement of it from the SCSGG.”
     Other points in the implementation stage of the IATA plan would:
     “Build upon output from AVSEC World 2006 Cargo Security Workshop to establish principles and priorities for global base line harmonization and supply chain security ownership and responsibility.
     Last month in Australia IATA AVSEC held a Cargo Security Workshop launching the process of developing the air cargo security system of the future.
     Sessions examined how to work in an e-freight environment, how and what types of technologies should be involved and what role cargo profiling will play.
     Discussions widened to include exploring ways to achieve a global framework that will result in mutual recognition of security systems between countries.
     Other initiatives under consideration by IATA Cargo on the road to implement change include:
     “Transition from developing solely air carrier-based IATA positions to supply chain positions.
     “Make IATA Cargo Security more accessible to and representative of the air cargo supply chain.
     “Develop a communications plan including an improved IATA Internet cargo facility.
     “By the end of Quarter 4 of 2006 calendar year, a work plan will be developed to map and monitor delivery of this strategy.”
     Mr. Edwards, long a proponent of better air cargo security joined IATA as the first head of cargo security July 1.
     The IATA Security Draft continues.
     “IATA Cargo Security will match its ability to be a primary industry influencer with the growth in relevant regulation.
     “We will continue to impact the development of emerging regulation and suitable, optimum cost, solutions.
     “The attributes of cargo security will be firmly established as a key element of the IATA Cargo value proposition.
     “Supply chain members will share ownership and responsibility for promoting harmonization of security regulation and controls.
     “We will have consensus amongst key supply chain stakeholder groups for global harmonization priorities and have baseline principles established.”
     Taking a future view also brings a reality check of the challenge to harmonizing air cargo security benchmarks with individual national governments around the world.
     “While almost 190 States have contracted to the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) Annex 17 Security, Safeguarding International Civil Aviation Against Acts Of Unlawful Interference, not enough have meaningful cargo security requirements within their national aviation security programs.
     “Of those who do, few are mutually recognized/accepted by other States and few definitions or requirements are universally consistent.
     “Many appropriate authorities have a limited understanding of the nature and complexity of the air cargo industry.”
     While serving as director of air cargo security and quality assurance at British Airways earlier in 2006, John Edwards set forth a blueprint in the publication- Aviation Security International saying:
     “Air cargo security is an emotive issue.
     “It is a vital component of homeland security.
     “Its objective is to protect society as a whole rather than the industry itself and yet, this is where the responsibility for compliance, and most of the cost, resides.
     “Viewed by those outside the commercial aviation industry, air cargo is perceived as potentially vulnerable, compared for example to passengers and their baggage. “There has been, since the heinous events of September 11th in particular, significant yet largely uncoordinated growth in its regulation.
     “Many industry stakeholders are familiar with politically driven proposals to screen 100% of cargo prior to its uplift on a commercial flight.
     “However most experts agree that, even if this is desirable (and many believe it is not) there is, for this, no silver bullet.
     “It is variously estimated that the development and, importantly, approval of technology, which could effectively and efficiently screen bulk air cargo, will take a minimum of three and possibly five or more years from today.
     “Despite all the changes we have experienced since September 11th, much remains to be done by the air cargo industry if it is adequately to influence global developments in security regulation.
     “The industry is most powerful when it speaks with one voice and consequently, in my judgment, the case for a cohesive industry harmonization strategy is compelling and the need, urgent.
     “While this will be resource-intensive and time-consuming, the resultant regulation is likely to be far more palatable and less harmful than if the industry fails to engage properly, and is simply and uncompromisingly, directed.”
In the draft Mr. Edwards notes:
     “There are strong links between cargo security and loss prevention and both are integral elements of the IATA Cargo value proposition.
     “Chapter 6 of the IATA Claims Handbook is entitled Loss Prevention. “The Cargo Agents Handbook includes recommendations for Asset Protection.
     “The IATA Security Manual references the security aspects of transporting high value goods and separately, crime in aviation and IATA hosts an annual Cargo Claim & Loss Prevention Conference.
     “To enable IATA Cargo to achieve leadership in this area, much of this material must be enhanced and, product development is likely required."
edwardsj@iata.org
(Geoffrey)