Vol. 7  No. 82                                         WE COVER THE WORLD                                                                       Monday July 28, 2008

Jail Time For
SAS Cargo Executive


     In USA, Timothy Pfeil, USA CSM at SAS Cargo Group has agreed to plead guilty and serve six months in jail for conspiring to fix air cargo rates.
     DOJ said Pfeil also agreed to cooperate with the agency's ongoing investigation.
     The charges filed in Federal District Court in Washington, D.C. say that Pfeil conspired with competitors to fix prices for customers on air cargo shipments. Pfeil was SAS' director of sales and marketing for North America.
     Earlier this month (July) SAS pleaded guilty to price fixing and was ordered to pay a $52 million criminal fine.
     U.S. DOJ said that the conspiracy began in January 2005 and continued until at least February 2006.
     During that time carriers agreed to set prices on certain routes and enforced compliance with the rates, DOJ said.
     To date air cargo price fixing investigations involving nine airline companies and two executives have netted more than $1.2 billion.
     BA and Korean were fined $300 million apiece in 2007.
     Japan Airlines was socked for $110 million, and Qantas was fined $61 million, and Bruce McCaffrey, a 33-year veteran of that carrier was reportedly thrown under the bus by the carrier and has ended up sentenced to eight months in jail.
     July 2008 has seen Cathay Pacific Airways, Martinair, Air France and KLM fined a combined total of $452 million in the investigations that seemingly will continue—to more fines and convictions of wrongdoing.

Big Jack Steps Down

     One of the truly great and to top that, genuine nice guys of air cargo during the past couple of decades—Jack Boisen, the top boss as vice president Continental Airlines Cargo will step down at the end of this month. Jack will continue to represent Continental Airlines Cargo in several important roles including leadership of TIACA and representation at industry forums, into November of this year.
     Named successor is Jim McKeon, who moves up through the ranks from senior director global sales and marketing at CO Cargo.
     Mr. McKeon joined Continental in 2001, was instrumental in developing CO Cargo’s innovative global account program and creating a new product development division.
     Further he expanded the company’s interline marketing brand, called GlobalLink.
     Jack Boisen came on the scene during the early 1990’s when few were certain that Continental Airlines would survive, let alone turn into the admired powerhouse carrier, both its passenger and (thanks to Jack) its cargo divisions are today.
     Along the way “Big Jack” gave it all he had for both airline and industry as well.
     Jack is a good guy who you couldn’t ask one more thing of.
     Except maybe this one last request.
     Jack, go and enjoy life and children and grandchildren and live a long time.
     Happy trails, Jack.
Geoffrey

KL/AF Surcharge Reaction

     E-mails keep pouring in, telephones are constantly ringing and faxes roll out of the machine:
     The airfreight industry seems to be mesmerized by KLM Air France Cargo’s new approach on prices.
     If the carrier’s announced change of price calculation was only intended to be a PR gag they already would have landed a very big hit.
     Which it is not, of course, since the airline insures that it is determined to take on things seriously by including fuel surcharges partly in the freight rates starting September 1.
     “We want to offer the industry a sustainable solution,” stated Jean-Charles Foucault, (right) Senior VP Sales and member of the joint cargo management committee at AF-KLM Cargo.
     By saying this he threw a snowball down the hill that has grown to a global avalanche.
     And of course like always when someone comes up with a new approach there are enthusiasts and critics that support or condemn the initiative.
     By far the biggest groups are the forwarding agents that maybe not unanimously, but in general, supporting the new price mechanism.
     “By including certain proportions of the fuel surcharges in the air freight rates our commissions will consequently be augmented to some extent,” lauds Michael Claus, (left) Miami-based Managing Director Global Partner Network of Hellmann extolling news from Paris.
     But he also warns the carrier:
     “We will very closely watch if this mechanism might eventually lead to hiking the prices at the end of the day.”
     “KLM Air France Cargo sent a sign by integrating the kerosene surcharge in the rate,” applauds Ruediger Ostrowski, helm of North Rhine-Westfalia’s (Germany) Forwarding and Logistics Association.
     Not without adding a ‘but’ to his statement:
     “To come to a final conclusion we still wait for detailed information that we have not been given so far.”
     He has touched a general problem since KL/AF Cargo released only meager information via internet together with a new price list that’s been sent to the customers following the Paris press meeting.
     Further, the training of their global sales force on the new and somehow complicated mechanism only started July 1.
     Therefore, it’s only now that the sales guys can swarm out to knock at the doors of agents and shippers to praise the new price model.
     One of the first clients they might visit is German pharmaceutical producer Roche Diagnostics.
     There, Dirk Schneider, Head of International Forwarding Management speaks of a “misleading package” the airline is offering the market.
     “Their calculation is based on the actual weight of a shipment and not the chargeable weight for volume freight.
     “Having mostly volume freight, we end up paying a higher price,” he claims.
     “If they don’t change this system we are going to shift tonnage from Air France - KLM Cargo to other carriers,” Schneider threatens.
     Meanwhile, turbine producer MTU is more relaxed.
     “If the final price of a shipment is not affected we don’t really care,” Odilo Muehling speaker of the Southern German high tech producer says.
     An “original and interesting initiative,” says KL/AF Cargo’s competitor Swiss WorldCargo.
     Pricing is a matter between the airline and the customer, states Bernd Maresch, Director Marketing and Strategy of the Swiss carrier.
     “Similarly we feel that talks of commissions and commissionability is irrelevant as the forwarder does not live on commissions.
     “Rather he negotiates rates with both shippers and airlines and is thereby compensated by the difference of the two prices,” the manager says.
     Meanwhile, LH Cargo does not intend to modify their price policy.
     “We will stick to our system which has become a worldwide standard,” says Head of Communications Nils Haupt. “The new KL/AF Cargo mechanism is too complicated and not transparent,” says Haupt as he rejects any intentions of following suit.
     Highly interesting is a hint from a leading Middle East agent.
     He claims that the French-Dutch carrier was practically forced to introduce the new price system.
     “If not, the European Commission or the U.S. Department of Justice might have stampeded further civil action lawsuits hitting the airline anew.
     “We’ve really been screwed for quite a while,” he says, “since the carrier did not react in their surcharge policy to the growing gap of U.S. dollar and euro. “Instead they kept charging an identical surcharge per kilogram in dollars and euros, thus making nice extra profits from all customers that had to pay their bills in euros.”
     In any case this disparity of currency will be abolished with the kick-off of AF-KLM Cargo’s new price calculation in September.
     Another take equally interesting put it this way:
     “I’ve said many times, that the airlines should not use freight forwarders as their collection agencies without reimbursement,” a highly placed forwarder who asked to be unnamed said.
     “The steps KL/AF are taking are in the right direction and Cargolux seems ready to follow.
     “It is about time that freight forwarders regain their fair share of participation in total freight cost charged by the airlines regardless of how these components are manipulated and labeled as freight charges, fuel surcharges and security surcharges.
     “This structure has got many carriers into trouble by not applying the same charges for everyone.
     “The industry understands that freight rates may vary based on volume and frequency of the cargo but mandated security and fuel surcharges should have been equal.
     “Manipulation of those items has lead us to where we are today, with fines and criminal indictments of carriers and freight forwarders and ultimately claims of shippers and consignees who were overcharged for those items.
     “We want our airline partners to make money and tell us which rates they need.
     “Forwarders will have to sell those rates to their customers.
     “To be perfectly clear the forwarders don’t set rates, the carriers do.
     “Freight forwarders in fact just have to live with carriers’ rates and pass them on as best they can.
Heiner Siegmund

Singh To Qatar Cargo

     Mr.Vikram Singh has joined the Cargo Department of Qatar Airways as Vice President Cargo Sales.
     Mr. Singh has 15 years of airline experience in various roles in the Middle East, Europe and Indian Subcontinent out of which he has spent a significant part at KLM.
     Qatar Airways Cargo has gained a reputation in the world transportation market as specializing in ‘Airport to Airport’ service delivering cargo to a growing list of international destinations.
     The passenger and cargo hub of Doha is at the crossroads of East and West, connecting the markets of Europe to the Middle East, the Far East, Indian subcontinent, Africa and Australia.
     Doha International Airport and its cargo warehouse are operated by Qatar Aviation, sister company to Qatar Airways Cargo.
     The impact of that relationship has impacted transit times that are arguably among the fastest in the business, just 90 minutes in many cases.
     Qatar Airways Cargo handles a variety of products, including time-sensitive and perishable items.
     With advanced IT, minimum transshipment times, and warehouse facilities including a mail area, strong room, cold room and freezer section, the airline is equipped to deliver as booked and in perfect condition.
     Situated halfway up the western shore of the Arabian Gulf, Qatar is almost completely surrounded by sea.
     Qatar borders Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates in the south and Bahrain in the northwest.
     Doha hosts the international airport, seaport, hotels, and sports facilities.
     Qatar's economy is very strong, due to its abundance of oil and natural gas reserves.
     This means that there is significant ongoing investment being made into the local infrastructure to support high standards of living and the successful development of tourism.
     Present population is estimated at 900,000 inhabitants most of whom reside in Doha, the capital city.
     The Emir, His Highness Sheikh Hamad Bin Khalifa Al-Thani has been the Head of the State of Qatar since 1995.
Geoffrey

FlyingTypers In
Your Own Write


To The Editor:

     You made a good point about whether airlines ought to give up some of their fuel surcharges to forwarders. I thought it was a clever way of discussing the announcement.
      However, I’m sure you know that there was a more important issue behind the AF-KL Cargo initiative. In my role as editor for Cargovision, which you know is published by AF-KL Cargo, I must help convey the logic behind this change so that it doesn’t wind up as a big fiasco. Hence, my email to you.
      I think AF-KL Cargo was trying to solve a couple of problems: (1) ongoing complaints from customers and (2) a way for the industry to avoid another US$1.2 billion in fines. At the AF-KL Cargo press conference last week, both Michael Wisbrun and Marc Boudier denied any connection between the timing of the announcement and the penalty from the DOJ; however, they did address the customer issues in detail and offer the mechanism as a methodology for the industry.
      Jean-Charles Foucault, whom I assume you know, went to some pains to explain how they arrived at a rational and equitable response to the forwarders’ main requests of the airlines: (1) adjust surcharges for distance so they are proportional to fuel costs, (2) stabilize the price changes and (3) base surcharges on the U.S. dollar price for jet fuel.
      AF-KL came up with a equitable methodology for switching from the old system to its new one. Unfortunately, explaining it required a bunch of calculations that distracted most of us from the logic of the mechanism itself. I had to sit on information for a few days before it became clear and, in the meantime, saw that the initial reports of it were a bit confused and speculative.
      This is rather long-winded, I realize, but I felt I should offer you more insight. Here is a story draft for next issue of Cargovision. I hope you will let me know whether it gives you more understanding.

Kind regards,
Mark

Mark W. Lyon
Editor-in-Chief
Cargovision
Air France - KLM Cargo
cargovision.org