FlyingTypers Logo
#INTHEAIREVERYWHERE
FlyingTypers Ad
   Vol. 14  No. 4
Wednesday January 14, 2015

Best In Show—TIACA Seoul

Best In Show TIACA In SeoulAll Together Now from left TIACA Secretary General Doug Brittin; WCO Secretary General Kunio Mikuriya; ICAO Secretary General Raymond Benjamin; newly-appointed President and CEO of Incheon Airport Park Wan-su; Korean Minister of Land, Infrastructure & Transport, Suh Seoung-hwan; TIACA Chairman Oliver Evans; TIACA Vice Chairman Enno Osinga.

     By now almost everyone who attended—and the legions of top flight air cargo companies that refrained from attending—have agreed that TIACA ACF held in Seoul, Korea, was on many levels less satisfactory than anticipated.
     But what about the Air Cargo Forum (ACF), the sessions in which many well-intentioned and dedicated smart people came forward and gave it their all?
     Here are a few sessions at ACF 2014 that were overlooked, as FlyingTypers’ exclusive in-depth session and workshop coverage continues. Analysis of the three leading air cargo events of the past few months—ACH Milan this past September, TIACA Seoul held in October, and FIATA Istanbul in November 2014—will continue throughout early 2015.
     You can click back to read our previous efforts below.
For Part I click here

For Part II click here
For Part III click here
For Part IV click here


Another Opening Another Show

Suh Seoung Hwan     Suh Seoung-hwan, Minister of Land, Infrastructure & Transport, Korea, opened the conference with a speech followed by a welcome from Wan-su Park, the newly appointed president and chairman of ACF-host Incheon Airport.
Park Wan-su      Suh Seoung-hwan said, “Since the successful bid to host ACF 2014 in 2009, the government has helped in making the event a success.”
     He added, “I hope this event will serve as a stepping stone for Incheon Airport and the Korean air cargo market to become a major player in Northeast Asia.”
     The conference focused on how the air cargo industry must work closely with regulators to deliver safe, reliable, efficient global trade and, given the audience of shippers, forwarders, GSAs, airlines, airports, industry bodies, and regulatory authorities, there can be no greater opportunity than ACF to express the views of the entire spectrum of stakeholders.
     “The industry is facing unprecedented challenges and unprecedented opportunities; we must face them together,” said TIACA Chairman Oliver Evans.
     “Collaboration is key. It is a long road, but it is an exciting one, and one of which we can be proud.”
Kunio Mikuriya and Raymond Benjamin      WCO Secretary General Kunio Mikuriya and ICAO Secretary General Raymond Benjamin also attended the plenary session. The messages were clear: “Getting information at an early stage, preferably pre-loading, is vital to deciding what approach is needed to high-risk cargo,” said Mikuriya. While Benjamin told the audience: “Air trade is an essential enabler of global connectivity, but we need to forge practical partnerships and solutions.”


Voice of the Shipper

     Later that day we heard the voice of the shipper. To lower prices and increase the efficiency of the air cargo supply chain, forwarders need to improve productivity through collaboration with governments, carriers, and shippers.
     Another common demand from shippers is the need for greater transparency, reliability, and flexibility—a service for which many shippers are willing to pay. One shipper commented that 67 percent of his shipments flew as planned and they struggled to deliver a service based on this level of performance. Furthermore, shippers need to see up-to-the-minute shipment status, rather than finding out later that the shipment has been offloaded,
     Trade still sees customs as a bottleneck, with standardization being key to the success of the industry. Once again, reference was made to benchmarking against the integrator model. It was also noted that too much standardization could harm air freight’s flexibility.
     It is not all doom and gloom. While air cargo faces challenges, such as modal competition, and shippers continue to squeeze their costs, it is still reliable, efficient transport and will continue to derive benefits from the growing demand for e-commerce and cold chain.


WORKSHOP 1: GLOBAL SHIPPER CHALLENGES (307 B&C)

      Workshop Theme: The recession made the supply chain evolve as companies struggle to survive.      Now it is the norm to use multi-modal shipping and to tailor the handling and tracking of the consignment according to its specific needs and the needs of its shipper. It takes intelligence, a constant exchange of data, and stronger collaboration between stakeholders. How are shippers handling modal shifts? What other issues challenge shippers, such as verifying carbon emissions? What can be done to improve this among partners?

Chris WelshMODERATOR: Chris Welsh, Secretary General, Global Shippers’ Forum
     Chris introduced the session and stated that cargo volumes were up 5.1 percent compared to 2013, but demand for air cargo is growing more slowly than GDP (in previous years air cargo enjoyed a growth of GDP X 2).
     The reasons being:
          
  Modal shift to ocean freight;
          
  On shoring and near shoring;
          
  Strategies to reduce transportation costs;
          
  Shippers commitment to report emissions and emission reductions.
     At a workshop held in Istanbul, shippers decided they wanted paperless solutions (the perception is that many sea freight solutions are far ahead of air freight). Shippers believe that replacing paper-based systems will speed up the process, reduce delays, and reduce transaction costs.
     Shippers also want to know the industry targets for cost savings and the targets for reducing the end-to-end delivery times by 24 hours.
     Chris asked each of the workshop teams to focus on deriving solutions for the following:
          1.   Increasing transparency and visibility of costs/surcharges
          2.  KPIS for enhanced performance and benchmarking
          3.  Greater customer focus
          4.  E-commerce solutions
          5.  Innovative solutions
          6.  Actions for building trust between air cargo industry and regulators
          7.  Developing elements for a reward system for those who get it right

     One group made the point that first the real customer—the person who places the order and pays the bill—needs to be identified.
     Outputs from the various groups included:
          
  Transparency
     Some felt that transparency should start with the freight forwarder. This would act as the catalyst for all to embrace the concept. Freight forwarders should list all costs and price options and share with shippers. Direct, proactive communication is required in case of delays, with more focus on operational excellence.
          
   e-Commerce
     Another group said that processes needed to be redesigned with a focus on G2G, including customs, security, airports, and trade departments. Start with low-hanging fruit where e-commerce is an accepted way of doing business such as Netherlands and Singapore (and Dubai?). The industry needs flexible, reliable, and user-friendly systems.
          
  KPIs
     Freight needs to be:
          1.   On time
          2.  Intact
          3.  Delivered as promised

          
  Innovative Solutions
          1.   Pre-clearance of goods to accelerate delivery and acceptance times
          2.  Mutual recognition of trusted trader programs
          3.  Data must be entered once and re-used across the supply chain

          
  Rewards
          1.   For clean electronic data
          2.   Faster service
          3.   Accreditation scheme
          4.   Increased reliability

     In summarizing, Chris stated three of the suggested solutions had been mentioned in previous shipper forums, including: service level agreements; KPIs relevant to the customer; and full visibility of costs consisting of one price (similar to that provided by the integrators) for the end-to-end service.
     Head of Cargo at IT powerhouse CALOGI Patrick Murray comments:
     “Yes to all of the above. I particularly like the simplified rating idea; this would make it easier to determine the final price. Fuel price volatility does not help the cause, as airlines seek to recover costs through additional surcharges. One airline I spoke to thought simplified rating would indeed be a good idea. If the integrators are our benchmark, we need to find a solution.
     “I am also a firm advocate of pre-clearance, and wider adoption will be key if we are to achieve the IATA objective of shaving 48 hours off of the transit time of a shipment.
     “Finally, service level agreements between forwarders/shippers and forwarders/airlines would push transparency. This is a must-do for the industry.”


WORKSHOP 5: CONNECTING COMMERCE AND CUSTOMS AROUND THE GLOBE

Workshop Theme:  Customs and security are essential to the supply chain, but businesses have traditionally treated both processes as obstacles, instead of colleagues and partners. Collaboration is vital for all three to fulfill their roles and push standards ever higher. How can regulators and industry work better together to share best practices, recognizing regional, as well as global issues?

Sue PrestiMODERATOR: Sue Presti, Senior Director of Government Affairs, TIACA.
     Sue invited comments from each of the participants on the above state of affairs. They include the following.
     The workshop participants generally felt that a lot of time has been spent in providing advanced data, but there is still a long way to go.
     There continue to be challenges on both sides, trade and regulatory, and the ACAS pilot (currently four years old) identified issues to be resolved. Everyone agreed collaboration is key to success, and dialogue with the industry needs to continue. In terms of ACAS, trade submitted many recommendations and several of these have been taken forward.
     Many felt there should be a common standard for advance data and ideally this should be achieved through joint consensus between ICAO and WCO, however, many also believed one standard may not be achievable. As an aside: ICAO and WCO agreed on a joint working group, and will take the issue of a common standard forward.
     Some of the audience felt that this forum would be a good platform to own the issue and take the leadership. LH already proposed changes to the WCO SAFE Framework of Standards and these are going to be adopted.
     Meanwhile, security and trade facilitation are intertwined; however, what works for one government does not work for another. Mutual recognition of trusted trader programs is also seen as a must do.
     Furthermore, there has been talk of one global technology platform enabling the submission of data between many customs authorities; without this the same debate is likely to take place at TIACA 2016.
     Another school of thought was that WCO SAFE should be the global standard and ICAO/WCO should engage member countries to agree changes, with only those that are agreed by 100 percent of the members being taken forward (similar to the way in which the IATA cargo IMP standard is developed). However, many participants felt this would not be achievable.
     Another participant asked if the security data that is now required could prevent another ‘Yemen’ incident. The questioner remained skeptical as to whether the provision of this data really helps.      Several stakeholders believed that screening helps, but the risk is still there.
     Currently 163 million shipments have been transported as part of the ACAS pilot. The workshop acknowledged that most of these belong to integrated carriers and SMEs now need to join the pilot.      One participant suggested that the regulatory authorities should provide help (a system) to SMEs who do not have the financial resources to invest in systems to generate the security data.
     Another member of the workshop suggested that to make things simple and quick, trade should define the standards and share them with the regulatory authorities for implementation. These standards should be voluntary and not mandated.
     One workshop attendee suggested that WCO and ICAO embark on a campaign to promote the SAFE standards so as to avoid deviation wherever possible.
     All agreed that moving forward, consultation with key stakeholder groups is key when it comes to providing data to regulatory authorities.
     Geoffrey Comments:
     "We agree on the industry-engagement model for designing and implementing regulatory standards, but one of the main issues is still who will lead it. I hope the ICAO/WCO partnership will find some way to resolve this.
     "The idea of a common database has been floated many times before, but who would build this and if there were several providers, how would the data be exchanged? It will be interesting to see how this pans out.
     "Despite low attendance, our overall impression of ACF and belief in the importance of a strong and vibrant TIACA is ever hopeful.
     "The dream of TIACA that dates back to when automotive engineers in the U.S. formed ACF is to provide an opportunity to meet with many potential customers.
     "Many industry leaders did show up in Seoul, although as has been said again and again, not enough attended, in our judgment.
     "These are the people who have the power to make things happen. Let’s hope we are still not discussing the lack of e-AWB penetration and the burden of managing differing advance security standards at TIACA 2016.
Geoffrey


If You Missed Any Of The Previous 3 Issues Of FlyingTypers
Access complete issue by clicking on issue icon or
Access specific articles by clicking on article title

Vol 14. No. 1
Up Up And Away 2015
Way To Go Dick Tracy
Chuckles For January 5
Wish We Said That
Home Of The Lightweights
Flying IndiGo
FT010715
Vol 14. No. 2
Buoyant Bellinder Brings 2015
India Extends 24/7 Customs
Chuckles For January 7, 2014
Take 5 And Hop Aboard A 3D Jet