| Brussels Backburners Security The interior ministers of the 27 EU member 
        states have resolved an “action plan” to tighten air cargo 
        security. However, upon examining the “holistic approach” 
        agreement closer, it turns out to be a mere wish list containing many 
        demands, proposals, and intentions for times ahead. The paper (tiger) is completely missing 
        immediate, tangible efforts for present implementation that would make 
        international cargo transports more secure.
 How controversial and personal this topic 
        is among EU politicians was demonstrated when Germany’s interior 
        minister, Thomas de Maizière, advocated a multi layer concept which 
        includes banning air freight transports from airports considered to be 
        unsafe.      Favoring an EU-wide black list on 
        insecure airports is a direct response to the recent discovery of explosive 
        devices hidden in packages originating from Yemen. However, this black 
        list proposal was rejected by a majority of his minister colleagues during 
        the recent meeting.
 Instead, Brussels’ summit members 
        decided to tighten air cargo security right on the spot and to first establish 
        a working group consisting of EU officials and industry experts that would 
        advise on necessary changes concerning the current security regime. Transport 
        Commissioner Siim Kallas seemed appeased: "Security standards at 
        European airports are widely acknowledged as being amongst the highest 
        in the world. But the threat is evolving and we must keep our defenses 
        under constant review. That is why we rapidly convened a high-level group 
        involving Commission and Presidency to draw up a joint set of EU actions 
        to address the new threat within a short timeframe.“
 
  His 
        colleague, Cecilia Malmstroem, the Commissioner for Home Affairs, added 
        that in order "to ensure an adequate response to terrorist threats, 
        a more streamlined cooperation and coordination between the transport 
        and justice and home affairs sector must be developed at EU level. This 
        challenge is of crucial importance to aviation security, but goes far 
        beyond this specific threat.” Coordinating, considering, intending, reviewing—here 
        is an excerpt of what is black and white in the “action plan”:
 
 •  Criteria 
        to identify cargo presenting a particular risk will be defined, as well 
        as a mechanism to allow for the evaluation of security standards for airports 
        outside of the EU. Specific commitments on consignment security will be 
        sought from EU carriers operating from non-EU countries.
 •  Consideration 
        will be given to the development of standardized training packages, to 
        ensure harmonized understanding of the EU rules.
 •  Research 
        will be conducted in order to enhance existing screening methods and technologies 
        for cargo and to develop new possibilities.
 •  The 
        EU inspection regime will be expanded to ensure that the agreed security 
        controls are properly implemented on the ground.
 •  It 
        is vital that information about incidents, new threats and emergency measures 
        is shared as quickly as possible, so that new threats and risks can be 
        tackled immediately. Steps will be taken to establish, facilitate and 
        strengthen the flow of such information.
 •  A 
        common all-source EU threat assessment capability will also be developed, 
        with input from all relevant agencies at Member State and EU level. On 
        this basis, the Commission will produce aviation security risk assessments 
        on a regular basis.
 •  ICAO 
        audits and capacity-building initiatives should be used as primary tools 
        to strengthen aviation security, including cargo supply chains in non-EU 
        countries. The EU should play an active role in these activities as such 
        actions will not only improve the security in non-EU countries, but will 
        also vastly benefit global trade.
 One critical observer commented, “A 
        toothless paper tiger was produced by the panel to sooth the public, but 
        there is little to show that it deserves the title ‘EU action plan’ 
        for improved air freight security.”
 Heiner Siegmund/Flossie
 |