| 
      
        |  Face masks amongst the flowers at Sanlitun Center 
            in Beijing, Sunday March 8, International Women's Day.
 The World Health Organization (WHO) in their latest report 
            said that 101,927 cases of COVID-19 have been confirmed globally, 
            of which 80,813 were confirmed inside China with 3,073 deaths so far.
 |  Despite all the negative impact 
          and disruption of the current COVID-19 outbreak, we as 
        business leaders need to adopt a levelheaded approach to navigate and 
        lead our teams through the complexities of this challenging time. This 
        is easer said than done though!
 The biggest challenge we face appears to 
        be how to make sense of fact versus sentiment. Much of this challenge 
        is being driven by a relentless onslaught of media coverage that by virtue 
        of their business objectives are competing for public attention; an objective 
        that in many cases is best achieved by focusing on aspects that drive 
        fear. The media is not the only one at fault though; we as humans, like 
        moths to a flame, are uncontrollably drawn to such excitement and hype, 
        the danger being that we take these reports at face value versus taking 
        the time to investigate further, debate and develop our own informed opinions.
 With the above said, I must admit that the 
        current situation we find ourselves in is not as clear cut as one would 
        like. There is no apparent simple answer to questions such as if we should 
        stop travelling for business and attending or hosting conferences. This 
        beast has many facets that need to be taken into consideration.
 According to the Word Health Organization 
        the restriction of the movement of people and goods during public health 
        emergencies is ineffective in most situations. The organization provides 
        some general guidelines that holds true for both international and domestic 
        travel. The key advice being that if you are ill you should avoid travel 
        and the same holds true “in particular for elderly travellers and 
        people with chronic diseases or underlying health conditions”. They 
        also provide some general guidelines, which as a seasoned traveler I find 
        a bit puzzling, as they are almost impossible to follow at times e.g. 
        “keeping a distance of at least one metre from persons showing symptoms”. 
        This is challenging in airport environments e.g. when lined up for security, 
        customs, boarding your flight etc., and when seated in planes, especially 
        in planes, where cabin air is being circulated; one sneeze or cough and 
        surrounding passengers are most probably impacted.
 To further complicate the matter, an infected 
        individual may be in an incubation phase and not display any symptoms. 
        There is therefore no guarantee, even if you do not encounter no coughing, 
        sneezing etc. during your journey, that you are safe. Does this mean keeping 
        a distance of at least one metre from all persons? And what about touching 
        surfaces such as seats, cups, trays, overhead bins etc. Who knows what 
        may await us there despite airline staff’s best efforts to keep 
        everything sanitized.
 At this point you might be thinking that 
        like the media, I am painting a bleak picture and advocating reasons why 
        international and domestic travel does not make sense. The risk is just 
        too high, right? Well that is not the case! My viewpoint is that if you 
        are still going to work and go about your daily routine as usual, you 
        might as well also continue travelling. With the caveat that you use common 
        sense to avoid areas of high-risk and follow WHO guidance where practical.
 If you hold the very same WHO recommendations 
        and standards true to our daily lives and routines at home, the only conclusion 
        one can reach is that in order to fully protect yourself from the COVID-19 
        risk, you have to lock yourself up at home and avoid any outside contact.
 Chances are that this is not the case though 
        for most people. Here is the point; despite your best efforts, you face 
        these very same risks multiple times each day i.e. being less than the 
        recommended distance from induvial who display some possible symptom or 
        not if they are in the incubation stage, touched a surface that has been 
        touched by someone that is infected etc.. In our global connected world, 
        you have no idea where these individuals have been, who they or items 
        you are touching have been in contact with, and if they have followed 
        good hygiene practices themselves. Think of going shopping, attending 
        church, commuting, children attending school etc. No matter where you 
        are if a case has been identified in your country, never mind your state, 
        city or town, you are facing the very same risk during these activities 
        as when travelling. So, if we continue with these activities but choose 
        not to fly, are we applying a double standard that makes no sense? Is 
        this any different for the majority of the population to what we generally 
        experience in peak flu season?
 Yes, the risk is higher for certain individuals, 
        but for the majority, from what I have read and can tell, the risk is 
        low and not much different to having flu. However, if you do become infected, 
        you need to keep in mind that you could now have a significance impact 
        on someone else who might be a high risk induvial. It is therefore critically 
        important to take all the WHO and CDC recommended actions when you suspect 
        you might be infected.
 For now I personally will continue to travel 
        for business. In terms of industry events I am torn as I would love to 
        support these important meetings, however I have no doubt that attendance 
        will be down at most of them, and because of this fact, the value of being 
        there both as sponsor and or attendee diminishes. And yes, from a company 
        perspective it makes sense to limit the number of attendees to manage 
        risk.
 My hope is that by Summer this is all behind 
        us and we will see a resurgence of trade, travel, sensibility and a strengthened 
        business environment for all industry stakeholders, with a strong 2020 
        second half to counter some of the downside we are experiencing in the 
        first half of the year.
 Lionel van der Walt
 
 
 Lionel van der Walt is CEO of PayCargo. Prior to his most recent 
        duties he served as President of IATA’s Cargo Network Services (CNS). 
        During his tenure at CNS, Lionel initiated several transformational approaches 
        toward strengthening and deepening the airline forwarder partnership. 
        Today the CNS Partnership Conference is the best annual air cargo event 
        for business outcomes between the airline/forwarder partners.  |